September 16, 2017


I may be more comfortable with my flaws than most. When told, "X company is better than most because they filter out the assholes," I thought, oh, I shouldn't apply there. They don't like people like me.

Carlyle's Vocabulary

Word
Definition
culminant
Of a heavenly body: That has reached its greatest altitude, that is on the meridian; hence fig. that is at its greatest height.


whinstone
A name for various very hard dark-coloured rocks or stones, as greenstone, basalt, chert, or quartzose sandstone.


shaveling
A contemptuous epithet for a tonsured ecclesiastic. (Very common in 16th and 17th c.)
fingent
Given to fashioning or moulding.
losel
A worthless person; a profligate, rake, scoundrel; in weaker sense, a ragamuffin, ne'er-do-well.
edacity
The quality of being edacious; capacity for eating; good appetite.
or
Corrosive quality, destructive power. Obs.
gulosity
Gluttony, greediness, voracity.
eleutheromaniac
one possessed by a mad zeal for freedom
fremescence
  An incipient roaring.
fremescent
  Murmuring, growing noisy.
grunsel
groundsel OR ground-sill
tripudiation
the action of dancing or leaping, esp. in token of joy or excitement; exultation.
weasand
The œsophagus or gullet.
obtest
To call upon in the name of something sacred; to charge solemnly, adjure; to beg earnestly, beseech, entreat, or implore (a person). Freq. with infinitive or that-clause as complement.
spontoon
  A species of half-pike or halberd carried by infantry officers in the 18th century (from about 1740).
furibund
  Furious, raging, mad.
scorine
????
bando
A public proclamation. Obs.
divulsive
Tending to tear apart or asunder.
handsel
To give (a person) a gift at the beginning of the year or day, on a birthday, etc., as a token of good luck. Also more generally: to give a gift on any occasion. Formerly also in ironic use: †to present or greet with something unwelcome (obs.).
scission
Division of a previously united body of people into mutually opposing parties; a split, a schism.
passe-partout
Originally: †a person who may go anywhere (obs.). Subsequently: a thing giving a person the right or opportunity to go anywhere; spec. a key that opens any or many doors, a master key; (occas.) a passport. Freq. in extended use and fig.
footling
Trivial, pointless; (of a person) that footles or trifles.
adust
Originally: affected with, or having a temperament determined by, adust humours (see sense 1a). In later use: having a melancholy character or appearance; gloomy; sallow. Obs.
or
That is in a dusty condition; covered in dust.
or
To burn, to scorch; to desiccate by exposing to strong heat. Also fig.
demit
trans. To send, put, or let down; to cause to descend; to lower.
phasis
esp. any particular aspect of a thing of varying appearances. Obs.
bob-miner
????
mittimus
Law. A warrant issued by a justice of the peace, etc., committing a person to custody. Now hist. exc. in U.S.
or
trans. To commit to prison by a warrant. Obs. rare.

apophthegm
  A terse, pointed saying, embodying an important truth in few words; a pithy or sententious maxim.
brayed ware
 a confusion for braided ware = damaged or faded goods;
epicedium
  A funeral ode; a lament over a dead person. Also in figurative contexts.
ferula

The giant fennel or From the use of the fennel-stalk in Roman times: A cane, rod, or other instrument of punishment, esp. a flat piece of wood (see ferule n. 2); fig. school discipline.

abutment
The point at which something abuts upon something else; a point of junction or meeting; a boundary. Also: a property or piece of land that abuts upon another; a description or record of how one property abuts upon another.
escarpment
Geol. ‘The abrupt face or cliff of a ridge or hill range’ (Page). Also attrib.
hodden
Woollen cloth of a coarse quality such as used to be made by country weavers on their hand-looms.
door-rabbet
A piece of stone (or occasionally timber) cut and shaped so as to form one side of an opening in a wall and accommodate a door, gate, window, or chimney;
fugle
To cheat, trick.
glen

A mountain-valley, usually narrow and forming the course of a stream.

shackly

Shaky, rickety; ramshackle.

hobbledehoy

A youth at the age between boyhood and manhood, a stripling; esp. a clumsy or awkward youth.

wynd
A narrow street or passage turning off from a main thoroughfare; a narrow cross-street; a lane or alley.
gillies
An attendant on a Highland chief. Now hist.
forehanded

That has made provision for the future; in easy circumstances, ‘well-to-do’. Now only U.S.

puncheon

A tool or machine for stamping a design on an object

or

A short upright piece of timber in a wooden framing to provide stiffening or support; a supporting post, spec. a post supporting the roof in a coal mine.

or

A split log or rough piece of timber with one smoothed surface, used esp. for flooring and corduroy roads, and formerly for buildings;

cheval-de-frise

A defensive appliance of war, employed chiefly to check cavalry charges, and stop breaches; a large piece of Timber pierc'd, and travers'd with wooden Spikes, arm'd or pointed with Iron, five or six Foot long.







On being likable


It's occurred to me lately that some people like me. I don't mean people being friendly to me because they want to have sex with me, or because they're trying to be professional, or because they're generally friendly people. I think--and bear with me here--that some people actually enjoy my company for its own sake. So much of our socializing is somewhat forced--you hang out with people because they are in the same school, or workplace, or social group. I always thought that I was being tolerated as part of the group. But--maybe--not always?

This opens up whole new vistas for me. The best I generally expect of other people is that they will tolerate me if I am quiet and don't cause trouble. (Legacy of a childhood being told to talk more, and then told I was crazy when I talked.) What would it be like if I instead believed that there was a real possibility some people would enjoy being around me?

Deep question. I wish I had known this earlier. I've started reaching out to people a bit more as a result. A friend called me this morning and I called him right back. On the telephone!

September 2, 2017

Ideologies are Teams

If an ideology is correct, everyone who believes in that ideology is a good person. Therefore, a feminist can never do bad things to women. And a conservative can never break the law.

If an ideology is correct, it must disagree with every incorrect ideology. If you believe in an incorrect ideology, you cannot simultaneously believe in a correct one, even on different topics.


The Victim/Villain Fallacy

There are two sides to every question: Red Team and Blue Team. You get to pick which side you're on, but you have to be on a side. You can't be neutral and you can't be for or against both sides.

What if I really, really hate them both? Response: If you were a right-thinking person, you'd be on the Red Team. Staying neutral means you must be Blue.

Can I be on Team Blue and still think their coach sucks? No. Picking a team means you are endorsing everything they currently do and everything they've done in the past, even before you were born.

One team is 100% innocent, the other team is 100% guilty. I say, "Red Team cheated!" This reveals I am on Team Blue. What if Red Team really did cheat? Doesn't matter. My saying something bad about Red is enough to establish I am Blue. The truth value of what I said, or whether I believe it to be true, doesn't matter.

Another way to play this game is the "How can you compare?" tack.
Me: "Red Team Player got arrested for beating up his girlfriend. They should fire him!" 


Response: "That's nothing! Blue Team Player murdered six women! How can you compare them?"


Me: "Murder is indeed worse than assault. Okay, fire Blue Team Player too."

Response: "Good. I'm glad we agree Red Team Player did nothing wrong."

What if I try to say something nuanced, like "Red Team has a great goalie but Blue Team has better offense"?

Two possible responses: you can choose not to remember part of this statement. "She said, AND I QUOTE, "Red Team has a great goalie." Therefore, she's on the Red side."

Or, you can assume bad faith. "She's trying to sound fair and balanced, but she can't really believe Blue has good offensive players; if she did, she'd be Blue, and we know she's not Blue, because she said something good about Red."

I don't know how to win this game. So far I just settle for pointing it out.