This is an interesting issue that I expect to neatly divide the liberals from the libertarians. Should "conversion therapy," a.k.a. therapy intended to make gay people straight, be banned?
Arguments against it:
- It's
unpopular with the mob. "In
two different national polls, more than 60 percent of Americans
indicated that they believe conversion therapy doesn’t work."
Who cares?
- The
American Psychological Association says it's not backed by evidence.
But this would support banning pretty much all psychotherapy, not to
mention alternative medicine. Psychiatry is not a science, and it's
common to see that any given treatment works for some and not
others.
- Part
of the reason there's no evidence base is that it's hard to verify
whether someone who says he is straight is straight. I don't see a
way around this, other than a longer follow-up period.
- Homosexuality
isn't a "mental illness." But whether something counts as a mental
illness or not is a political decision. People should be able to
seek treatment for whatever is troubling them, regardless of whether
it's in the DSM.
- Conversion
therapy sometimes makes people feel worse. Again, no different from
any other therapy.
- Children
should not be given conversion therapy because they don't have the
capacity to freely consent to it. I'm pretty sympathetic to the
argument that children shouldn't be brainwashed. But why is
brainwashing bad when applied to “correct” homosexuality, and
not when applied to “correct” drug use, heterosexual sex, bad
grades or any of the other sins for which children are sent to
therapy?
Argument for:
- Boils
down to the basic libertarian argument that people ought to be able
to do what they want to with their own lives. Like it or not, some
people don't want to be gay and are desperate for a way to avoid it.
Cultural liberals may think it's laughable or sad for a gay man to
marry a woman and call himself straight. But is it any more absurd
than some of the weird sex liberals get up to?
